Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:38

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Tampering & Pettiness?! Golden Knights-Marner Saga Takes Dramatic Twist - Vegas Hockey Now
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do Trump supporters like Andrew and Tristan Tate?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
That ‘unsubscribe’ link is actually a hidden security risk — do this instead - Tom's Guide
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Google’s Gemini AI will summarize PDFs for you when you open them - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are the consequences of sleeping with a married woman?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Threads is testing spoiler text, Zuckerberg says - TechCrunch
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.